![]() ![]() Of course a (re-)muxing process natively, has nothing to do with re-encoding, de-interlacing, etc. So again, IMO it's about how you (want to) look at it. Or, if one tries to resolve an issue by muxing a sourcefile only with added/other muxing-settings, I would call that a remux too. Suppose you import a mkv into mkvtoolnix, drop a source-subtitle and add another one, mux to mkv again. In my view, the word remux would not only be used when "keeping original source streams and mux into another container". ![]() It's subject to consideration indeed, as ron spencer stated. Pre-playback, software de-interlacing for me forcibly comes into play when I need to slow-down certain sped-up (24fps based) PAL music material to native speed (4% speed-change for music is awfully much and can completely devastate groove & rhythm and tonal experience).Īs for the "remux phrase" itself, it's how you want to look at it. As stated earlier, it often is better to leave it as-is. Normally I let my player or tv take care of de-interlacing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |